The Twentieth Century Society


South Bank Centre South Bank Centre

South Bank Centre rejected for listing



The Twentieth Century Society is bitterly disappointed with the latest decision not to list the Southbank Centre. Despite a rigorous recommendation by English Heritage, central government has again gone against their advice and refused to grant listed status to this important brutalist complex.

The decision follows an application for a Certificate of Immunity from the owners earlier this year which has now been granted. The Southbank Centre has applied to the Arts Council England for funding of £20 million towards the refurbishment and renewal of the Queen Elizabeth Hall, Purcell Room and Hayward Gallery complex.

We have been in on-going consultation with the owners regarding future ambitions for the site and totally support their desire for an ever-changing range of innovative and temporary pop structures that encourage people to explore the buildings. However we would be concerned about major permanent massive extensions.

The Twentieth Century Society has repeatedly called for the listing of this ensemble, constructed by the LCC’s / GLC’s Architect’s Department between 1963 and 68. It sits in the Southbank Conservation Area, between the National Theatre (Grade II * listed) and Royal Festival Hall (Grade I listed).

The complex – an arts centre which includes the Purcell Rooms, Queen Elizabeth Hall and Hayward Gallery – showcases some of the best and most important Brutalist architecture in the country. As well as being a distinguished complex in its own right, it also provides a coherent visual link between the two other listed buildings. It is ridiculous that the Southbank is not considered listable even at grade II.

This is the fourth time the complex has been rejected for listing. The international importance of the Southbank Centre has been recognised by the World Monuments Fund who added the complex to their 2012 “Watchlist” of endangered brutalist buildings in October last year.

Posted in Uncategorized


2 responses to “South Bank Centre rejected for listing”

  1. Catherine Croft says:

    Very dissapointing decision— the weird green stuff in Henrietta’s photo is lots of stacked up plastic bowls with holes in them (pound-shop colanders/salad spinners??) makes it look like trifids are about to take over….and covers some gorgeous concrete, of course…. not one of the best installations (I loved the knicker fairy-lighjts though, last winter)

  2. James Dunnett says:

    The ever more frantic efforts to jolly up the buildings of the South Bank complex look ever tattier and more depressing and fail to disguise the original crudity, ovescaled details and unsympathetic finishes. It was simply misconceived by failing to have any concept of external space – just external ledges. In places it works better indoors where the tat is kept at bay – the gents loos with the inch-tick joints between tiles are quite good, and the mushroom-headed columns have something to be said for them. But, as I said before, the whole complex should be pulled down and rebuilt on the Hungerford Car Park – better.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 155 other followers: